Hello treeku.
You see, perhaps the problem lies in the expectations. We are not lawyers, which means that I or my colleagues do not approach the withdrawal from some legal standpoint. We adhere to the Fair Gambling Codex instead. The way I see the situation, you willingly deposited in a casino with a low safety index, and now you are saying that the withdrawals are not proceeding as expected. Well, it makes sense, because the casino is not very trustworthy, at least now, based on its review:
I believe we're saying the same thing here.
Your complaint, if we focus on facts, progressed to the point where you were advised to use one of the alternative payment options available to you. I understand you have a preferred payment option for the withdrawal, but it does not appear to be available anymore. However, this does not necessarily imply that the casino is unwilling to pay you. It appears that you prefer not to use a different option.
What I'm gathering from the complaint specialist's latest response is that this casino will face NO consequences for intentionally withholding my funds. Let me be absolutely clear about what's happening here:
The casino is UNWILLING to pay me directly.
They are doing this indirectly by ONLY enabling P2P (peer-to-peer) withdrawal options. This means my withdrawal depends entirely on OTHER players depositing money. the casino pays me nothing from their own funds.
This is not a legitimate withdrawal option. This is them gaming the system.
They want YOU to believe they're offering me a way to withdraw, when in reality:
- Nobody uses P2P
- Withdrawing thousands of dollars through this method could take MORE THAN A YEAR if I'm lucky
- This "option" is functionally useless
If you're going to close my complaint, it should be resolved IN MY FAVOR, not in favor of this shady casino that is clearly acting in bad faith. That's all I'm asking.
