EZCASH Casino – generell diskussion

Om du vill diskutera något relaterat till EZCASH Casino – det kan vara spel, bonusar, betalningsmetoder, problem med ditt konto, ansvarsfullt spelande eller något annat – kan du göra det här.

God dag! Det här kasinot lurade mig för $200, jag registrerade mig hos dem, gjorde en satsning, det vann, jag bestämde mig för att ta ut pengarna för att inte ryckas med, nästa dag vaknade jag och fick detta: Din profil #*** **** blockerades på plattformen i samband med misstänkta eller identifierade brott mot reglerna för användning av webbplatsen. Jag kontaktade supporten och de sa till mig att jag var blockerad på grund av någon form av övergrepp, och de skulle inte lämna tillbaka mina pengar till mig, faktiskt, de stal helt enkelt andras pengar!

Hi, the casino didn't give you any more specific explanation, did they ? In such cases I would like to know what happened because it's quite general and it's hard to know what the real problem was. 

Anyway, did you make just one bet ? Is your case about sports betting ? Did you play with a bonus or not ?

Let me know.

Hälsningar! Jag gjorde bara en satsning, hon vann och jag satte pengar för uttag, nästa dag märkte jag att jag kastades ut från mitt konto, och försökte logga in igen men kunde inte, jag kontaktade supporten, de skrev till mig "Du är spärrad för ett missbruk, kontot kan inte låsas upp med förbehåll för" Jag vet inte ens vad detta missbruk av dem är! Jag satsar mina riktiga pengar, inte några bonusar och allt annat! Ja, jag satsar på sport!

Oh, I'm sorry about this whole situation but I'm afraid it's probably not possible to help you if your case concerns sports betting, because we don't have any experts or branch in this field and that's why we don't deal with such cases. 

Veronika in your complaint also asks you to clarify this fact, so would it be possible to answer her ? 

I would try to help and share some links where sports betting is dealt with, so maybe you could try that: 

https://www.bookmakers.bet/submit-a-complaint/

https://www.top100bookmakers.com/contact-us/

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/sportsbook-complaint/

Hope you will get the help you need and if something will change, then you can update us.

Fingers crossed 🤞

Tack, andra eftermålvakt. Nu vet jag att jag inte kan åka dit. Tja, det är synd om dina 200 dollar såklart 🙂

Did the post of the player in question save you and you said yourself it's not worth depositing here ? 🙂

Vet du hur man kontaktar casinot? Jag kan inte återställa åtkomst till mitt konto genom att återställa mitt lösenord.

I couldn't find any email address, but have you tried some of these options?

som du såg finns det inget informativt där. och det finns inget sätt att återställa åtkomst. det visar sig att de bara kan stjäla dina pengar

Hey, GODENKOR!

I guess it is worth a complaint because it means the casino rep will be notified about the new case. I would also consider trying the Telegram option or social media channels for further communication. Occasionally it helps....

The casino uses unofficial software (script-based emulators) disguised as licensed games from well-known providers (Pragmatic Play, BGaming).

An analysis of network traffic using developer tools (DevTools / Network / iframe inspection) revealed that the developers' original servers are completely bypassed during the spin processing sequence.

Technical evidence of manipulation:

Single emulator server: All games load from an unrelated, anonymous domain—1035v1eqx.com—which has no connection to the providers' official infrastructure.

Fictitious session routing: Slots are launched via an internal script: [https://1035v1eqx.com/api/index.php/v1/client/games/launch/](https://1035v1eqx.com/api/index.php/v1/client/games/launch/).

Substitution of Pragmatic Play servers: In genuine games (e.g., *The Dog House*, *The Dog House Megaways 1000*), connections should be made to *.pragmaticplay.net servers (using the /gs2c/ protocol). On this site, however, game logic is calculated on a third-party PHP server.

Substitution of BGaming servers: The crash game *Aviamasters* is similarly proxied through the same 1035v1eqx.com server hub instead of the official *.bgaming-network.com hosting.

Hey, I can see why you consider this a strong indication, and I agree that the way the games are technically loaded and routed is certainly worth looking into.

I would just be a little careful with the conclusion that this proves the games are manipulated or that the casino is using unofficial emulators.

There can be different technical setups behind online casino games. For example, a white-label or B2B platform can provide the game interface and handle the technical routing through its own infrastructure, so the domain visible in the browser does not necessarily have to be the domain of the actual game provider.

For me, there are two separate questions here:

A) Where the game is technically hosted/routed

and

B) Who actually determines the game outcome.

What you found in the network traffic may be quite relevant to A, but I don't think it automatically answers B. Seeing the game requests going to a third-party PHP server does not necessarily mean that this server is independently generating or controlling the results. It could also be part of a different technical setup between the casino and the actual provider.

This is also why I would personally be interested in having this checked by someone who deals with game integrity and technical game verification. I believe this is something Gamecheck, for example, specialises in (https://gamecheck.com/online-casino/ezcash-casino), and I would probably consult them at the very least. Even better would be to get confirmation from the relevant game providers themselves.

I am saying this mainly because the statement sounds quite absolute to me, while what I see here is essentially a technical analysis of the network traffic, rather than confirmation from someone officially dealing with the games or from the providers themselves.

So from my side, I would definitely consider this interesting information and something that may be worth further investigation done by proper authority in this field.

Fair points, but there is a major catch regarding how B2B platforms and white-labels actually work with providers like Pragmatic and BGaming.

Routing vs. Math Calculation: While white-labels use proxies or aggregators for assets, the actual slot math (RTP, spins, win/loss calculation) must be processed by the provider's remote game server (GS2C for Pragmatic, socket/API for BGaming) to maintain valid certification. When an entire game is proxied through a random PHP script on an anonymous domain (1035v1eqx.com) that mimics the API instead of talking directly to the provider's backend, the casino can easily alter responses.

Why Gamecheck won't help here: Tools like Gamecheck mainly verify basic game metadata or frontend assets. They can't sniff hidden backend-to-backend proxies unless they have direct API credentials from the provider.

I totally agree that getting official confirmation from the providers themselves is the only way to put this to rest. Since you mentioned looking into this further, let's have them or the casino request a direct audit from Pragmatic/BGaming regarding this specific session. I've got the full network logs ready if needed.

Sure, then go ahead and place the request there. We will be happy to see any official statements, for example in the form of screenshots, once you receive a response from any of the parties or companies mentioned.🙌