1 år sedan
Does anybody play bubble roulette? I created a system that statistically should win 68.1% of the time or more.
Play Bubble roulette?
Skriv inlägg
1 år sedan
Hi what exactly is bubble roulette ? Can you please tell me a bit more about it ?
As for the system you are talking about, how does it work ? 🤔
1 år sedan
Jaro-Bubble roulette is like bubble craps, the game is inside a big bubble. The bubble, wheel, and ball are physical things while the software keeps track on a big board. I've been told the ball is "launched" pneumatically with compressed air.
The system is one I "tweaked" and is very boring, but I've tried it 6 times and not lost yet. I know a lot of people share systems freely, but I wouldn't mind a monetary tip from you if I give it to you (free) if you win big or consistently. Message me at my email name left. It's a boring system, bets depend on what the wheel has previously spun. It goes against the grain and bets on cold numbers, which a lot of ppl shy away from. My reasoning is: that ALL the numbers gotta hit sometime. A.I. confirms my system has a 70% (68.1%, I rounded it up) chance of hitting and up, depending on which "base number" you start with. It's a waiting game with you picking the time you want to jump in. The base number can change to a larger number upping the percentages to win up to 76% or greater.
1 år sedan
How does the principle of number outcomes in this particular roulette differ from a regular wheel, aside from the fact that it operates with pneumatics? In both cases, random numbers fall within a specified range (0-36); in both cases, there are hot and cold numbers, percentages of non-occurrence for certain types of bets, and so on.
Why does your system work for one but not for the other? What's the fundamental difference?
1 år sedan
Allo4ka- I'm turning what was meant for evil in America (2 green numbers- 0/00, created to give the casinos a greater edge over us rather than 1 on the European wheel) to my advantage by betting the green numbers. I friend of mine in India cited a study that stated that cold numbers showed up on an average of 2.63% of the time. He didn't realize until I pointed out that is the exact same % as a hot number or any other # on the wheel- 1 number, 38 slots= 1 divided by 38= 0.0262. To convert to percent, move 2 decimal point to the right= 2.62%. As there are 2 green numbers, the odds of one landing are 5.6%, 2 divided by 38= 0.0526= 5.2% as opposed to 2.6% with any other number. They are twice as likely to land as ANY SINGLE NUMBER on the wheel. This proves the point that cold numbers are just as likely to hit any time, just like hot numbers or any other number. While its true that cold numbers are not really "DUE" (no numbers are truely due for that matter) , the fact is they have not hit for longer than the other numbers. Starting with my base number (which can be changed) and waiting and being very selective as to when to jump in, A.I. confirms there is a minimum of 68.1% chance of hitting a cold number within 17 additional spins. The % goes higher the longer you wait, but if you wait too long a green # will be called and the system will have to start over. The system MUST be played on a bubble roulette table with a physical wheel and ball where no random numbers are called by the computer. No system can beat a random number generator. This system can be used at a table ,but sin ce you are waiting (and sometimes a long time) they are not gonna let you stand there taking up space and not betting, but you could stand by and jump in later. There's more if you want.
1 år sedan
Jaro-Bubble roulette is like bubble craps, the game is inside a big bubble. The bubble, wheel, and ball are physical things while the software keeps track on a big board. I've been told the ball is "launched" pneumatically with compressed air.
The system is one I "tweaked" and is very boring, but I've tried it 6 times and not lost yet. I know a lot of people share systems freely, but I wouldn't mind a monetary tip from you if I give it to you (free) if you win big or consistently. Message me at my email name left. It's a boring system, bets depend on what the wheel has previously spun. It goes against the grain and bets on cold numbers, which a lot of ppl shy away from. My reasoning is: that ALL the numbers gotta hit sometime. A.I. confirms my system has a 70% (68.1%, I rounded it up) chance of hitting and up, depending on which "base number" you start with. It's a waiting game with you picking the time you want to jump in. The base number can change to a larger number upping the percentages to win up to 76% or greater.
1 år sedan
Hmm, I understood it better, because I have never heard of such a roulette before. Anyway, I don't think there is any need to ask for a tip for the information provided. I was asking about the system mainly to know if you use any apps to help you play, because it is forbidden in casinos and also forbidden to advertise on our forum.
However, it is quite interesting to me that you find such tactics, because I am rather skeptical about them in general. But "100 people 100 tastes."
And not to forget, you can use the "reply" button, which can speed up the reply to your posts, as the player is notified when you use it. Good luck.
1 år sedan
- To be honest, I still don't quite grasp how the principle of number outcomes in this variant of the game differs from classic roulette, where the ball rolls around the wheel and lands on random numbers in the range of 0 to 36 (or 00 for American roulette).
- There seems to be some confusion in your calculations: in one instance, you mention a 5.26% probability for a successful landing on one of 2 numbers, but later on, you mention 5.6%.
- If you find the 5.26% probability for two numbers in American roulette good, then in the classic version, you get a 5.4% probability for two numbers. What are the actual benefits of American roulette then?
- I've analyzed millions of gaming sessions on different roulettes, and the most misses for a single number I've seen was 538 times. This doesn't mean it's the absolute maximum in history; it's just what I personally encountered. Although incredibly rare, it does happen. Such a number could also be very cold. Take a look at the image I attached: the number 9 appeared only 11 times in the last 1000 spins, making it the coldest of all. It hasn't appeared consecutively for 227 spins, but the problem is that it may not appear for just as many more spins.
- Given all that, I honestly don't quite understand how your AI predicted a 68.1% probability for a cold number (or for the two coldest numbers) over the next 17 rounds - to me, it seems like mere chance in this case.
1 år sedan
No, no apps or devices that measure the spin of the wheel or the speed of the ball. It's just a system I figured out using common sense and percentages. Yes, I was skeptical also until openchat GPT confirmed the percentages.
1 år sedan
I'll try to respond point by point: 1. Its not different from classic table roulette, but this system dictates that player must wait a certain amount of time (spins) before jumping in to wager. At a real table they will not let you just stand there and not bet while takeing up space while others want to play. It is different than a totally electronic roulette machine that uses a RNG. No one can beat a RNG. This system must be played in a bubble machine where the outcome is physical not computer generated. 2. I may have switched 2.6 or .6 inadvertantly, don't worry about that. You are talking tenths or hundreths of a percent. 3. The advantage of American roulette is that there are 2 green numbers, when you are betting on them. This system bets on green numbers when they are cold, thus you have 2 chances of landing instead of one. (5.2% instead of 2.6%) 4. Yes, a number missing 538 times is increcibly rare or 111 times out of 1,000. These are the extremes. I could also say that I've seen the green numbers hit 7 or 8 times consecutively, but this would be extreme also. Throw out the extremes and focus on the more consistant percentages. We all know the wheel can be a monster sometimes, thats the nature of the beast, thats why it is gambling. 5. After a wait of the certain number of spins in which the numbers turn "cold," (my base number) the chances of them hitting are exactly the same as a hot number or any other number (2.6%.) In this case, since we are betting the green numbers, the chances improve to 5.2%, 2 divided by 38 instead of 1 divided by 38. We have doubled our chance of hitting a cold, green number There is a 17 spin "window" in which it is profitable if you hit, after 17 spins it is not profitable. A.I. says there is a 68.1% chance either a 0 or 00 will hit within that window. I couldn't do the math myself, thats why I asked A.I. The more you stretch out the base number, the higher the percentage increase that you will hit a cold green number according to A.I. What you are missing and what I have with held is the "base number", which I was hoping to recieve a little gratitude fo.. I will give the system away free but hoping for a little love if someone hits it big or wins consistantly.
1 år sedan
- I deliberately emphasized initially on online roulettes where a physical ball is rolling, which eliminates the need to constantly place bets during the wait. It turns out there's no difference.
- The main thing is to make sure randomness doesn't sneak into your calculations 🙂
- You reason very strangely about the advantage of American roulette from the standpoint of color. 0 and 00 are regular numbers in American roulette, just like any others. But in terms of the probability of a single number (or two numbers) coming up, American roulette is worse than the classic one, as I have already shown you above. If you want to bet on 2 numbers at the same time, place a split bet on the classic roulette for any 2 numbers. With the same input data you're using on American roulette. Only the percentage probability will be higher. And, oddly enough, you're focusing on just two numbers, while your solution can be scaled to any number of splits or just two separate numbers.
- You can, of course, discard extreme values (which I did) for calculating various statistical indicators. But the problem is that any few numbers from the range of your bets can start growing to new extremes. With the data you have, you can't predict this in any way.
- I don't believe, I'll be honest, in any 'base number.' Their main problem is that even if it worked a few times, it might not work consecutively in other cases. As a result, due to previous lost bets, you accumulate a certain amount of loss that you need to recover using the same method over a long time, and it might not work again. The point is that there is no universal method. What worked for you at some point and is working now can turn into your curse at some point. And having only one tool and one indicator to rely on, you'll be forced to use it to recoup your losses. That's a road to nowhere. There should be several tools and references for risk diversification: if something fails and doesn't win, something else will.
1 år sedan
By the way: read about 'false optimistic' results of the ChatGPT answers.
1 år sedan
Lol, ok sister. Prolly ANY system gives false optimism when playing the wheel from hell!
1 år sedan
No, no apps or devices that measure the spin of the wheel or the speed of the ball. It's just a system I figured out using common sense and percentages. Yes, I was skeptical also until openchat GPT confirmed the percentages.
1 år sedan
Thank you for the clarification. I'm still not sure if I would trust artificial intelligence in these things and systems, but that's my opinion. You came up with your system by your own calculations and therefore tried to confirm or verify it somehow. If it makes sense to you and you feel that it helps you, okay. But I'm pretty skeptical about these things. Just so much for my opinion.
1 år sedan
I mean, it's trained to do its best to answer the question, and if the answer is unknown or too negative for the asking person, it may start to hallucinate and can imagine the answer. Sometimes you need to check twice after ChatGPT 🙂
Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan
Sorry to step in.
I just want to say I'm glad you mentioned that.
A few months ago, I witnessed something similar with my own eyes when dealing with a chatbot (obviously powered by chat GPT) Well, that makes one wonder what will happen to the reliability of the given information in general since this clever tool is getting more and more popular.
Have a good one!
1 år sedan
Don't think it was hallucinating, lol. Just Mathematics too complicated for me to perform.
