ForumAndra casinospelEvolution Roulette not fair and honest.

Evolution Roulette not fair and honest.

1 år sedan av paora
|
15081 visningar 77 svar |
|
1 2...4
1 år sedan

I have a question which applies to all online roulette games but it's Evolution 'Live' Roulette which I usually play. Ever played anything in Evolution Roulette which theoretically wins as many sessions as it loses and yet when you play it there it loses EVERY session. I have played so many strategies which are capable of winning but aren't failsafe and can also have losing sessions but to lose all the time while playing on Evolution Roulette tables is beyond ridiculous and dare I say it, crooked!

1 år sedan

I also have strategies which have highs and lows - winning one minute and losing the next. I can watch a game for 300+ spins go through these winning and losing streaks (none of them extreme one way or the other) but I swear that the moment I start playing any of these strategies there comes a rapid and devastating losing run which I am never allowed to recover from.

paora
1 år sedan

Jag spelar bara evolution roulette. Jag har en som jag har spelat konstant i flera år. Allt är precis detsamma. Det spelar ingen roll vilken roulette vi spelar.

För tillfället du spelar spelas samma roulette av tusentals andra spelare runt om i världen. Och varför skulle du ta roulette bara för dig?!

Anledningen är att när en spelare förlorar så ser han alltid och ALLTID boven i rouletten och inte i sig själv.

Automatiskt översatt:
1 år sedan

file

Jag spelar denna evolution roulette och ingen annan. Och det gav mig många fina vinster. Det var också förlustmatcher, men misstagen var mina.

Automatiskt översatt:
zorans71
1 år sedan

When I win a session, I'll agree with you but at the moment the evidence is all on display in my spreadsheets and there definitely is a rapid change in the game EVERYTIME I start putting money down. It gets even worse when I start increasing my bets. Maybe it's the way I play which attracts attention and your way of playing doesn't.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
paora
1 år sedan

Probably because you play for too long, the longer you play, the most likely it is you will give back to the casino everything you have won, have in mind you are always betting -EV, you will always lose in the long run. That's why no matter what betting scheme, staking plan or strategy you are following, you should get your hits and move on, when I play roulette at most I play for about 20 spins, usually covering the zero and 9 numbers to both its left and right, I play it for 5 spins and if I'm winning I move on and if I'm barely breaking even I play a bit more, I usually use 5 to 10% of available balance, which means at max I will lose half of it if the 5 initial spins lose. Rarely I play for more than 30 minutes any game, except for craps. Just get your hits and move on, set a bottomline and a target profit, if you deposit 200 bucks don't expect to withdraw 2000, keep it realistic, don't get too greedy, and if you want to play for a long time just hedge your bets properly to keep you in the table for a long time

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

I played this very simple 'strategy' the other day. Betting on repeat dozens which theoretically should win 10 out of 30 spins. So I watched it hover around winning 6 to 14 times for 500 spins. The moment I started betting it dropped to 5 times or even less that a repeat dozen was occuring and that continued for at least 200 spins with it hitting 10 times in 30 spins only very occasionally and very briefly. And I repeat this started happening (like it always does) as soon as I started betting. Playing both repeat dozens AND columns may have been less devastating for me but I wanted to demonstrate a point and just playing the dozens showed it up the way I expected it would.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
paora
1 år sedan

For that 30% implied chance to be accurate you will need hundreds of thousands spins, 500, 2000 spins do not represent the actual chance

1 år sedan

For that 30% implied chance to be accurate you will need hundreds of thousands spins, 500, 2000 spins do not represent the actual chance

1 år sedan

I won't entirely disagree with that but the way it turned so quickly and so brutally on the one of 6 options I chose to play is highly suspect. I should mention my 6 options.

  1. Play repeat dozen
  2. Play repeat column
  3. Play cold dozen
  4. Play cold column
  5. Play inbetween dozen
  6. Play inbetween column

"Inbetween" of course is the dozen or column that hasn't hit last spin or the dozen or column which hasn't taken longest to hit.

The option I chose to play, repeat dozens. was the only one to do really really really badly.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

Probably because you play for too long, the longer you play, the most likely it is you will give back to the casino everything you have won, have in mind you are always betting -EV, you will always lose in the long run. That's why no matter what betting scheme, staking plan or strategy you are following, you should get your hits and move on, when I play roulette at most I play for about 20 spins, usually covering the zero and 9 numbers to both its left and right, I play it for 5 spins and if I'm winning I move on and if I'm barely breaking even I play a bit more, I usually use 5 to 10% of available balance, which means at max I will lose half of it if the 5 initial spins lose. Rarely I play for more than 30 minutes any game, except for craps. Just get your hits and move on, set a bottomline and a target profit, if you deposit 200 bucks don't expect to withdraw 2000, keep it realistic, don't get too greedy, and if you want to play for a long time just hedge your bets properly to keep you in the table for a long time

1 år sedan

I'm talking about playing the same number of spins in any session and losing every time. I don't play every spin only when the percentage of wins drops to a certain point and then I play until it recovers - unfortunately that recovery doesn't happen too often (if ever) when I play. It only recovers when I watch.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

I also think the Evolution software targets players who have freshly joined in - putting them in the red at the beginning. Nothing worse than having to recover a loss before you can think about winning. There's no doubt the software is extremely powerful and extremely clever.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

I won't entirely disagree with that but the way it turned so quickly and so brutally on the one of 6 options I chose to play is highly suspect. I should mention my 6 options.

  1. Play repeat dozen
  2. Play repeat column
  3. Play cold dozen
  4. Play cold column
  5. Play inbetween dozen
  6. Play inbetween column

"Inbetween" of course is the dozen or column that hasn't hit last spin or the dozen or column which hasn't taken longest to hit.

The option I chose to play, repeat dozens. was the only one to do really really really badly.

1 år sedan

I'm going to play all 6 options next - as soon as I've got my spreadsheet set up to help me keep track of when and which option(s) I should be betting on.

paora
1 år sedan

Have you ever tried any other game (baccarat, blackjack)? If roulette isn't working for you, don't stick to it, roulette is a bad RTP game, I would recommend my two favorites instead: baccarat and craps, specially craps. If you feel a game isn't working for you and you are not even enjoying it, don't stick to it

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

I also think the Evolution software targets players who have freshly joined in - putting them in the red at the beginning. Nothing worse than having to recover a loss before you can think about winning. There's no doubt the software is extremely powerful and extremely clever.

1 år sedan

There are dozens of players in each table, it would be impossible to target one specifically unless he is the biggest active player, the one placing the largest bets, and manipulating the outcome would only be profitable for the provider if the payout for that single player is higher than the overall payout for the rest of the players, but even if this was true, it's not Evo taking the liability, the liability is on the casinos offering their games, so it wouldn't make much sense to do so, I do suspect live gameshows are ridiculously manipulated in every level, but I'm not 100% sure about the table games. Weird stuff does happen on the table games from time to time and I even have video of it, on baccarat: scanned cards being different than the actual ones on the table, dealer stopping for a long time while the betting round is active for no reason and without explanation provided, bets rejected and casually the bet would have been a winning one and more, but all these events can simply be defined as software malfunctions, which coincidentally only benefit the casinos

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

Got my spreadsheet setup and only the opportunity for ONE bet so far after 90 spins - a winning one. What I'm waiting for is the win rate for any of my options to fall below 6 in 30 spins which is the thing I endured when I bet repeat dozens in my last LOSING session for 200 spins. lol

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

Got my spreadsheet setup and only the opportunity for ONE bet so far after 90 spins - a winning one. What I'm waiting for is the win rate for any of my options to fall below 6 in 30 spins which is the thing I endured when I bet repeat dozens in my last LOSING session for 200 spins. lol

1 år sedan

I didn't even take that first win ...wasn't ready. I needed to record a few (90) previous spins in my spreadsheet before anything showed up for me to bet on.

1 år sedan

Well so much for that. Just played my newest strategy and got dragged down 20 units in the set number of spins I decided on. In 30 spins after I stopped playing that -20 has been fully recovered by the strategy and is even in credit now. Don't tell me this Evolution software doesn't cheat. lol

PS. I don't even play high stakes which kinda makes it hilarious. I'm a hobby player determined to beat them a little bit sometimes. 🙂


Update: Strategy is now in credit with 9 units up. Of course I'm not a winner because I stopped playing.

Update: Up 17 units now but I have to admit a drop little decrease at times but nothing like the brutal takedown I experienced when I was playing.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

Jag spelar bara evolution roulette. Jag har en som jag har spelat konstant i flera år. Allt är precis detsamma. Det spelar ingen roll vilken roulette vi spelar.

För tillfället du spelar spelas samma roulette av tusentals andra spelare runt om i världen. Och varför skulle du ta roulette bara för dig?!

Anledningen är att när en spelare förlorar så ser han alltid och ALLTID boven i rouletten och inte i sig själv.

Automatiskt översatt:
1 år sedan

They only have to target a small percentage of players at any time. As long as they have them playing catchup (in arrears) they can leave those losing players alone and concentrate on making another lot lose.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
1 år sedan

Paora...

file

se,

1. 1700 spelare spelar för närvarande på detta bord.

2. På de senaste 13 kasten har 12 nummer från den stora serien fallit.

Men det här bordet används i hundratals andra kasinon. Antalet spelare som spelar varje ögonblick mäts i tiotusentals, hundratals!!!

Tror du att någon verkligen kommer att följa dig med några mellanliggande investeringar?

Självklart inte. Ingen spåras av programvaran. Han är bara ansvarig för att välja slumpmässiga nummer, betala ut vinster osv...

Hur många spelare spelade den stora streaken när dessa 12 nummer föll. Mycket, och alla vann. Även i det ögonblicket spelade många spelare en liten serie, de förlorade. Och visst kommer de att säga arrangerat.

Och allt är en fråga om sannolikhet.

Roulette är ett rättvist spel.

Ändrad av författare 1 år sedan
Automatiskt översatt:
1 år sedan

Jag spelar bara evolution roulette. Jag har en som jag har spelat konstant i flera år. Allt är precis detsamma. Det spelar ingen roll vilken roulette vi spelar.

För tillfället du spelar spelas samma roulette av tusentals andra spelare runt om i världen. Och varför skulle du ta roulette bara för dig?!

Anledningen är att när en spelare förlorar så ser han alltid och ALLTID boven i rouletten och inte i sig själv.

Automatiskt översatt:
1 år sedan

Had to come back to this. It's 2000 at most at any evolution roulette table - easily controllable.

1 2...4

Gå med i vårt community

Du måste vara inloggad för att skriva ett inlägg.

Registrera dig
flash-message-news
Nyheter från Casino Guru – Följ dagliga nyheter från spelbranschen
Trustpilot_flash_alt
Vad tycker du om Casino Guru? Dela din feedback
Följ oss på sociala medier – Dagliga inlägg, insättningsfria bonusar, nya spelautomater och mer
Prenumerera på vårt nyhetsbrev för det senaste om insättningsfria bonusar, nya spelautomater och andra nyheter