Diskussion om artikeln Hur vi granskar onlinecasinon (sida 3)

Hello, thank you for your patience. I believe I understand the problem, but loyalty bonuses are a bit of an edge case for mediation because they fall between no-deposit and deposit bonuses, each with their own special conditions. You are welcome to lodge a complaint, but I cannot promise the request will be accepted.

Totally agree blanket warnings don’t help much without a name

God morgon, jag skickade in en recension av Papibet Casino och den avvisades av Guru. Jag gjorde två insättningar och lade märke till att de har en låg RTP, vilket innebär att huset alltid vinner. Mitt mål var att varna folk för att slösa sina pengar, eftersom casinon som har låg RTP bara vill vinna och inte agerar rättvist. Eftersom min varning avvisades ligger ansvaret hos Guru, eftersom detta casino finns på din lista.

Underskrift: Paulo

Hello, and thanks for reaching out. You know it takes more than a feeling that the RTP is lower for it to be published as a casino review, because, as you said, we are responsible for the content published on our website. Imagine the casino sending an email stating that the RTP is okay and games are licensed. We would retroactively reject the review anyway.

But I feel you, and I appreciate your efforts.

Such text is exactly the material for the forum. "I thought the casino was really bad; it operates with a very low RTP, even though it has plenty of slots. I played a few of them, and they barely loaded. With 10 years of gaming experience, I can tell when a casino has a low RTP." However, I suggest getting in touch with GameCheck; that's our way to get players with such suspicion to the best source, and the reason why we have added this into the casino review: https://casino.guru/papi-games-casino-review 👈